https://cfaio.org/insights Commentary and analysis on the board-level discipline of AI oversight governance. Short, argued, and grounded in fiduciary duty. en-us https://cfaio.org/the-informed-decision-standard https://cfaio.org/the-informed-decision-standard Tue, 19 May 2026 09:00:00 -0400 Boards keep asking whether their AI governance is good enough. The honest answer is a test, not a checklist: can the organization demonstrate, in evidence, that it made an informed decision about AI risk? https://cfaio.org/caremark-and-ai-oversight https://cfaio.org/caremark-and-ai-oversight Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:00:00 -0400 AI oversight is not a new legal theory. It is the existing duty of board oversight, established in Caremark and sharpened in Marchand, Boeing, and McDonald's, applied to the newest mission-critical risk. https://cfaio.org/the-committee-fallacy https://cfaio.org/the-committee-fallacy Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:00:00 -0400 Forming an AI committee is the most common response to AI risk, and the most misleading. A committee is a venue. Governance is a program. The difference is what a court will ask about. https://cfaio.org/the-velocity-gap https://cfaio.org/the-velocity-gap Tue, 03 Mar 2026 09:00:00 -0500 AI is being adopted faster than most organizations can govern it. The distance between the speed of adoption and the speed of governance is where fiduciary risk, regulatory exposure, and missed opportunity accumulate.